hey all…dag havent been here in months on this thread. Please tell me you
guys arent still supporting this turd Obama and you have woken up to the
fact that hes just as bad if not worse than the last turd. If not tis okay.
The next will be even worse
ChangeDaChannel November 18, 2014
State Of The Union 1991, 1996, 2007, 2014
watch?v=Qzpw00qq1UQ
4 turds sayings the same words
54markl November 18, 2014
I support gay rights, and I realize that most gays are good liberals. But
the ones here are really disgusting ultracons, and I don’t like them at
all. Nose-holding time.
kennygl2008 November 18, 2014
Do any Conservatives have anything substantive to contribute to this
thread? All you’ve offered are comments containing rants, lies, and
distortions of reality!
brainerdrebel November 18, 2014
We need to go to a National Sales Tax and get rid of the Income Tax. Could
you imagine not keeping tax records.
Edward Solomon November 18, 2014
There is only one logical practice of the Second Amendment, and that is
that it shall not be infringed. Any other practice is an absurdity, for it
contradicts the very purpose of the Second Amendment in its entirety; it is
the ultimate form of popular recourse against tyranny, and thus no
potential tyrants may restrict it. The Second Amendment is the Supreme
Sovereign; to surrender the Second Amendment, is to surrender the
sovereignty of self-government.
Edward Solomon, 2013
EagleOfJustice1776 November 18, 2014
Lots of Breaking Wind in the Democratic Party Signals the “Official Start”
of a “New Round” of what has proven to be a constant Democratic
Presidential Campaign since 2011 for the 2016 struggle of trying to sell
to Americans The Same Old Smoke, Mirrors and Lies the Democrats have used
in the past to distract from their failed policies of Obama’s
Two Dismal Democratic Presidential Terms, laden with scandal and
corruption.
Topsy Kritts November 18, 2014
they teach that hitler killed millions in school too bad thats a lie just
like 98% of history books
justicepartyuk November 18, 2014
Obama is prophesied as the person who will destroy Arabia
kennygl2008 November 18, 2014
Let’s see now, with Republicans achieving more power, how will they attempt
to do their part in “governing” America? Try to push for tax cuts for the
rich and powerful and deregulation? Of course, they will now push for the
TPP, and the Keystone XL pipeline! What will the outcome of these
Republican endeavors be if they succeed? I’d like to read the comments of
Conservatives in relation to my question.
Angra Mainyu November 18, 2014
There are two types of people in Hell. The ones who do bad and the others
who sit by and watch as the ones do bad. Both Demoncraps and Repugnantcons
are the bad ones and the people are the others who sit by and watch.
LMFHO!!!!!!
Tas Mikigal November 18, 2014
Obama Chooses Lynch to Succeed Eric Holder as Attorney General
Image: Obama Chooses Lynch to Succeed Eric Holder as Attorney General U.S.
Attorney Loretta Lynch. (Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
Friday, 07 Nov 2014 01:54 PM
President Barack Obama has chosen Brooklyn prosecutor Loretta Lynch as his
nominee to succeed Attorney General Eric Holder.
Lynch, 55, is in her second stint as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District
of New York and had originally been under consideration for the Justice
Department’s No. 2 job. She rose as a contender for attorney general after
former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler pulled herself out of
contention for the post.
“Lynch is a strong, independent prosecutor who has twice led one of the
most important U.S. attorney’s offices in the country,” according to a
White House statement today.
Lynch, who would be the first black woman to lead the Justice Department,
is regarded as a law-and-order prosecutor who took on banks and also
developed a reputation for knowing how the Justice Department works.
Obama will announce his pick tomorrow at the White House, where he and
Lynch will be joined by Holder, according to the statement.
Lynch was seen as having an easier path to confirmation than two others
under consideration: Solicitor General Donald Verrilli and Labor Secretary
Tom Perez, who are closely tied to Obama’s record on issues that will be
attacked by Republicans.
Lynch oversees federal prosecutions in an area of New York that includes
Brooklyn, Staten Island, Queens and Long Island.
During her current tenure, the office negotiated a $1.92 billion
money-laundering settlement with HSBC Holdings Plc in 2012 and is
investigating whether banks violated anti-bribery laws by hiring the
children of government officials in China to win business.
Lynch’s office aided in a federal investigation that resulted in Citigroup
Inc.’s agreement in July to pay $7 billion in fines and consumer relief to
resolve claims it misled investors about the quality of residential
mortgage-backed bonds sold before the financial crisis. Her office was also
involved in Bank of America Corp.’s $16.7 billion settlement to end federal
and state probes into mortgage-bond sales.
If nominated and confirmed, Lynch would be the first U.S. attorney elevated
directly to the top Justice Department job since the 1800s.
54markl November 18, 2014
YouTube is very good to provide comments pages, so that people can air
their opinions. Unfortunately many people, especially teenagers and senior
citizens (and middle aged people), are very rude and stupid, and are also
ignorant and bigoted. They abuse the privilege. Their jumbled and malignant
thoughts indicate that there is small hope for the human race, and gives
evidence that we are little more than savage and quarrelsome apes in a
monkey house.
Bois d'arc November 18, 2014
I was right, there are many here that have surrendered to fear and have
colored your judgement with self serving opinions and actions not befitting
a patriot and citizen of this country. So I will make my statements and
when needed will lend my life to oppose you as I already have to protect my
country, from enemies, from within and without. Come for me and I will
shoot you and my fellows will help me, for we are the citizens and the
patriots of America.
ChangeDaChannel November 18, 2014
gtfooh….lololol really? Sorry but dang man you’re too easy.
Fabricio Valdes November 18, 2014
Obama will be beaten to death by starving inhabitants of the Washington
city.
Obama’s body will be hung upside down like the Mussolini body.
EagleOfJustice1776 November 18, 2014
America was doing fine before 2009
brainerdrebel November 18, 2014
Gruber is right Americans are to stupid to know what is going on.
54markl November 18, 2014
We don’t have to take a lot of Guff from the descendants of Anglo-Saxon
pirates in Kentucky. They’re hiding up there because they all have six
fingers on one hand, LOL!
kennygl2008 November 18, 2014
Thumbs-up this post if you’re voting Tuesday, November 4, 2014!
Bois d'arc November 18, 2014
I think the GOP has taken the bait and are going to get the payback for
their years of obstruction now. I hope they threaten a government shutdown.
Tas Mikigal November 18, 2014
We have ancestors who Paid with their lives to protect us from a mandated
taxation! They are calling it a penalty but it is really a taxation..
EagleOfJustice1776 November 18, 2014
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well
regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Such
language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment’s intended
scope. On the one hand, some believe that the Amendment’s phrase “the right
of the people to keep and bear Arms” creates an individual constitutional
right for citizens of the United States. Under this “individual right
theory,” the United States Constitution restricts legislative bodies from
prohibiting firearm possession, or at the very least, the Amendment renders
prohibitory and restrictive regulation presumptively unconstitutional. On
the other hand, some scholars point to the prefatory language “a well
regulated Militia” to argue that the Framers intended only to restrict
Congress from legislating away a state’s right to self-defense. Scholars
have come to call this theory “the collective rights theory.” A collective
rights theory of the Second Amendment asserts that citizens do not have an
individual right to possess guns and that local, state, and federal
legislative bodies therefore possess the authority to regulate firearms
without implicating a constitutional right.
In 1939 the U.S. Supreme Court considered the matter in United States v.
Miller. 307 U.S. 174. The Court adopted a collective rights approach in
this case, determining that Congress could regulate a sawed-off shotgun
that had moved in interstate commerce under the National Firearms Act of
1934 because the evidence did not suggest that the shotgun “has some
reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well
regulated milita . . . .” The Court then explained that the Framers
included the Second Amendment to ensure the effectiveness of the military.
This precedent stood for nearly 70 years when in 2008 the U.S. Supreme
Court revisited the issue in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller
(07-290). The plaintiff in Heller challenged the constitutionality of the
Washington D.C. handgun ban, a statute that had stood for 32 years. Many
considered the statute the most stringent in the nation. In a 5-4 decision,
the Court, meticulously detailing the history and tradition of the Second
Amendment at the time of the Constitutional Convention, proclaimed that the
Second Amendment established an individual right for U.S. citizens to
possess firearms and struck down the D.C. handgun ban as violative of that
right. The majority carved out Miller as an exception to the general rule
that Americans may possess firearms, claiming that law-abiding citizens
cannot use sawed-off shotguns for any law-abiding purchase. Similarly, the
Court in its dicta found regulations of similar weaponry that cannot be
used for law-abiding purchases as laws that would not implicate the Second
Amendment. Further, the Court suggested that the United States Constitution
would not disallow regulations prohibiting criminals and the mentally ill
from firearm possession.
1969lincolnosiris November 18, 2014
+EscapeforMankind
*Since you claim both sides are the same, I fail to see what your numbers
are supposed to mean?* *Other than proving that you are a liar.*
Cyote Uggly November 18, 2014
at 1hr 36 minutes they show a clip from the alex jones show and he is
taking ”calls” from viewers and i could Swear that this ”anthony” is
actually Jakari Jackson , and alex jones employee …..
hey all…dag havent been here in months on this thread. Please tell me you
guys arent still supporting this turd Obama and you have woken up to the
fact that hes just as bad if not worse than the last turd. If not tis okay.
The next will be even worse
State Of The Union 1991, 1996, 2007, 2014
watch?v=Qzpw00qq1UQ
4 turds sayings the same words
I support gay rights, and I realize that most gays are good liberals. But
the ones here are really disgusting ultracons, and I don’t like them at
all. Nose-holding time.
Do any Conservatives have anything substantive to contribute to this
thread? All you’ve offered are comments containing rants, lies, and
distortions of reality!
We need to go to a National Sales Tax and get rid of the Income Tax. Could
you imagine not keeping tax records.
There is only one logical practice of the Second Amendment, and that is
that it shall not be infringed. Any other practice is an absurdity, for it
contradicts the very purpose of the Second Amendment in its entirety; it is
the ultimate form of popular recourse against tyranny, and thus no
potential tyrants may restrict it. The Second Amendment is the Supreme
Sovereign; to surrender the Second Amendment, is to surrender the
sovereignty of self-government.
Edward Solomon, 2013
Lots of Breaking Wind in the Democratic Party Signals the “Official Start”
of a “New Round” of what has proven to be a constant Democratic
Presidential Campaign since 2011 for the 2016 struggle of trying to sell
to Americans The Same Old Smoke, Mirrors and Lies the Democrats have used
in the past to distract from their failed policies of Obama’s
Two Dismal Democratic Presidential Terms, laden with scandal and
corruption.
they teach that hitler killed millions in school too bad thats a lie just
like 98% of history books
Obama is prophesied as the person who will destroy Arabia
Let’s see now, with Republicans achieving more power, how will they attempt
to do their part in “governing” America? Try to push for tax cuts for the
rich and powerful and deregulation? Of course, they will now push for the
TPP, and the Keystone XL pipeline! What will the outcome of these
Republican endeavors be if they succeed? I’d like to read the comments of
Conservatives in relation to my question.
There are two types of people in Hell. The ones who do bad and the others
who sit by and watch as the ones do bad. Both Demoncraps and Repugnantcons
are the bad ones and the people are the others who sit by and watch.
LMFHO!!!!!!
Obama Chooses Lynch to Succeed Eric Holder as Attorney General
Image: Obama Chooses Lynch to Succeed Eric Holder as Attorney General U.S.
Attorney Loretta Lynch. (Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
Friday, 07 Nov 2014 01:54 PM
President Barack Obama has chosen Brooklyn prosecutor Loretta Lynch as his
nominee to succeed Attorney General Eric Holder.
Lynch, 55, is in her second stint as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District
of New York and had originally been under consideration for the Justice
Department’s No. 2 job. She rose as a contender for attorney general after
former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler pulled herself out of
contention for the post.
“Lynch is a strong, independent prosecutor who has twice led one of the
most important U.S. attorney’s offices in the country,” according to a
White House statement today.
Lynch, who would be the first black woman to lead the Justice Department,
is regarded as a law-and-order prosecutor who took on banks and also
developed a reputation for knowing how the Justice Department works.
Obama will announce his pick tomorrow at the White House, where he and
Lynch will be joined by Holder, according to the statement.
Lynch was seen as having an easier path to confirmation than two others
under consideration: Solicitor General Donald Verrilli and Labor Secretary
Tom Perez, who are closely tied to Obama’s record on issues that will be
attacked by Republicans.
Lynch oversees federal prosecutions in an area of New York that includes
Brooklyn, Staten Island, Queens and Long Island.
During her current tenure, the office negotiated a $1.92 billion
money-laundering settlement with HSBC Holdings Plc in 2012 and is
investigating whether banks violated anti-bribery laws by hiring the
children of government officials in China to win business.
Lynch’s office aided in a federal investigation that resulted in Citigroup
Inc.’s agreement in July to pay $7 billion in fines and consumer relief to
resolve claims it misled investors about the quality of residential
mortgage-backed bonds sold before the financial crisis. Her office was also
involved in Bank of America Corp.’s $16.7 billion settlement to end federal
and state probes into mortgage-bond sales.
If nominated and confirmed, Lynch would be the first U.S. attorney elevated
directly to the top Justice Department job since the 1800s.
YouTube is very good to provide comments pages, so that people can air
their opinions. Unfortunately many people, especially teenagers and senior
citizens (and middle aged people), are very rude and stupid, and are also
ignorant and bigoted. They abuse the privilege. Their jumbled and malignant
thoughts indicate that there is small hope for the human race, and gives
evidence that we are little more than savage and quarrelsome apes in a
monkey house.
I was right, there are many here that have surrendered to fear and have
colored your judgement with self serving opinions and actions not befitting
a patriot and citizen of this country. So I will make my statements and
when needed will lend my life to oppose you as I already have to protect my
country, from enemies, from within and without. Come for me and I will
shoot you and my fellows will help me, for we are the citizens and the
patriots of America.
gtfooh….lololol really? Sorry but dang man you’re too easy.
Obama will be beaten to death by starving inhabitants of the Washington
city.
Obama’s body will be hung upside down like the Mussolini body.
America was doing fine before 2009
Gruber is right Americans are to stupid to know what is going on.
We don’t have to take a lot of Guff from the descendants of Anglo-Saxon
pirates in Kentucky. They’re hiding up there because they all have six
fingers on one hand, LOL!
Thumbs-up this post if you’re voting Tuesday, November 4, 2014!
I think the GOP has taken the bait and are going to get the payback for
their years of obstruction now. I hope they threaten a government shutdown.
We have ancestors who Paid with their lives to protect us from a mandated
taxation! They are calling it a penalty but it is really a taxation..
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well
regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Such
language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment’s intended
scope. On the one hand, some believe that the Amendment’s phrase “the right
of the people to keep and bear Arms” creates an individual constitutional
right for citizens of the United States. Under this “individual right
theory,” the United States Constitution restricts legislative bodies from
prohibiting firearm possession, or at the very least, the Amendment renders
prohibitory and restrictive regulation presumptively unconstitutional. On
the other hand, some scholars point to the prefatory language “a well
regulated Militia” to argue that the Framers intended only to restrict
Congress from legislating away a state’s right to self-defense. Scholars
have come to call this theory “the collective rights theory.” A collective
rights theory of the Second Amendment asserts that citizens do not have an
individual right to possess guns and that local, state, and federal
legislative bodies therefore possess the authority to regulate firearms
without implicating a constitutional right.
In 1939 the U.S. Supreme Court considered the matter in United States v.
Miller. 307 U.S. 174. The Court adopted a collective rights approach in
this case, determining that Congress could regulate a sawed-off shotgun
that had moved in interstate commerce under the National Firearms Act of
1934 because the evidence did not suggest that the shotgun “has some
reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well
regulated milita . . . .” The Court then explained that the Framers
included the Second Amendment to ensure the effectiveness of the military.
This precedent stood for nearly 70 years when in 2008 the U.S. Supreme
Court revisited the issue in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller
(07-290). The plaintiff in Heller challenged the constitutionality of the
Washington D.C. handgun ban, a statute that had stood for 32 years. Many
considered the statute the most stringent in the nation. In a 5-4 decision,
the Court, meticulously detailing the history and tradition of the Second
Amendment at the time of the Constitutional Convention, proclaimed that the
Second Amendment established an individual right for U.S. citizens to
possess firearms and struck down the D.C. handgun ban as violative of that
right. The majority carved out Miller as an exception to the general rule
that Americans may possess firearms, claiming that law-abiding citizens
cannot use sawed-off shotguns for any law-abiding purchase. Similarly, the
Court in its dicta found regulations of similar weaponry that cannot be
used for law-abiding purchases as laws that would not implicate the Second
Amendment. Further, the Court suggested that the United States Constitution
would not disallow regulations prohibiting criminals and the mentally ill
from firearm possession.
+EscapeforMankind
*Since you claim both sides are the same, I fail to see what your numbers
are supposed to mean?* *Other than proving that you are a liar.*
at 1hr 36 minutes they show a clip from the alex jones show and he is
taking ”calls” from viewers and i could Swear that this ”anthony” is
actually Jakari Jackson , and alex jones employee …..
aside from that , pretty good movie