Deploy a .NET Application to AWS Elastic Beanstalk with Amazon RDS Using Visual Studio

8 Comments

  1. Pretty happy that they decided to throw in Amazon RDS with free tier. I’m wanting to try this setup out to get a better grasp of .NET and running Beanstalk. One recommendation though would be to not use a size of 250gb, as that would set you over the 20gb max for free tier. 

  2. Hi,I am using oracle AWS RDS,
    I am deploying My .NET applications Getting an error,
    Error is::: Environment not found,
    tell me what is the problem

  3. Hi.Tell me the how to implement # party Identification,
    google,yahooetc……….
    Tell me the code
    pls help me

  4. Sorry about the tttt, I was getting an error and testing. AWS has a bunch of videos including one that discusses various ways of publishing to the Elastic Beanstalk. I know there’s an API so start here.
    docsdotamazonwebservicesdotcom/elasticbeanstalk/latest/dg/GettingStarted.html

  5. Is there any documentation for how to manually deploy a .NET application to Elastic Beanstalk with Git instead of using Visual Studio? As I’d like to see how it could be automated from a build server that doesn’t contain Visual Studio.

  6. I don’t see much use for pads. A laptop offers more for what it’s worth

  7. Hey Cholo, You should definitely wait for the new Kindle Fire! You can pre-order it for only $ 199 now and it is coming out on November 15.

    You can find it here to pre-order (I just did and I’m super excited!): http://url.ie/dg0q

    What’s great about pre-ordering is that it even comes with free subscription to Amazon Prime. It’s like Netflix but better!

  8. Hi, Cholo, before Barnes & Noble announced the brand new Nook Tablet, iPad was clearly the superior device although also heavier and much more expensive than Kindle Fire or Nook Color. However, now it’s not that clear – take a look at a quick side-by-side of just released next generation Nook Tablet from Barnes & Noble vs. Nook Color and Kindle Fire to gain an understanding on how much the new device is closer to iPad for half the price:
    – Nook Tablet has a dual-core processor vs. single core of Nook Color
    – Nook Tablet has 1.0 GB of RAM (memory) vs. 512 MB of both Nook Color and Kindle Fire
    – Nook Tablet has 16 GB of capacity to store content vs. 8 GB capacity of both Nook Color and Kindle Fire
    – Nook Tablet’s battery is rated for 11.5 hours of reading and 9 hours of video playback on one charge vs. 8 hours or reading and 7.5 hours of video of Kindle Fire and Nook Color
    – Nook Tablet has microSD card slot to expand the capacity by another 32 GB for videos/photos/ebooks vs. no expandable slot of Kindle Fire
    – Nook Tablet has the world’s most advanced fully non-glare laminated HD screen with the best viewing angles on the market vs. no anti-glare coating of Kindle Fire
    – Nook Tablet comes loaded with optimized Netflix, Hulu Plus for streaming of millions of movies and shows vs. none of those available on Kindle Fire
    – Nook Tablet has a built-in microphone thus it can be used with Skype for voice conferencing and for dictations with speech recognition software vs. no mic on Kindle Fire or Nook Color.
    – Nook Tablet weights only 14.1 oz vs. 14.6 oz of Kindle Fire and 15.8 oz of Nook Color.
    Also it’s worth mentioning that if you walk in with any Nook to Barnes & Noble store, you’re allowed to read ANY available eBook for free while in the store via free provided in the store Wi-Fi where Nook eBook store has over 2 million of paid books and about the same number of free public domain books. Nook already has Cloud as your ebooks are stored in your online library as well as downloaded to your device. For streaming movies and shows, it has Netflix and Hulu’s Clouds with much better content that Amazon could ever hope to offer.

Comments are closed.