The kindle fire is defiantly more a tablet then an ereader. Frankly the silk browser is going to be way better than the ipad browser, considering it supports flash and youtube etc.
You can get a good deal on the kindle fire here: http://www.shoppersource.net/goto/kindle_fire
I would totally go for the kindle fire over the alternatives, since not only is it the cheapest cost full featured tablet going, but it amazon is going to have the hugest media selection that is going to dwarf everyone else. They already own the publishing world, and now they are moving into movies etc, which you will have full access to on the fire.
So YES, it’s just like an ipad – it supports fast web browsing, youtube, runs google android apps, media player & color ereader- which considering the price it’s insane.
Ken December 31, 2012
The Kindle Fire, like all LCD-based ereaders, is really a tablet. While it’ll be fully capable of being used to read ebooks, it’ll also perform great on those other non-reading applications that you seek. Be aware, however, that’s it will not be the best for long-run reading. The E Ink ereaders display ebooks via ambient light just like physical books and are excellent for long run reading but lousy for apps, games, web browsing, and videos.
Yes, the Kindle Fire will be competitive with the iPad. So many will be sold that developers will be drawn to the platform like they were to the iPad. There are already many apps available (but not yet nearly as many as iPad/iPhone/iPod). Amazon is keeping the cost of the Kindle Fire low in hopes to make more money selling apps and other media. With its previous Kindle success, and with its success as an online merchant in general, it’s well positioned succeed with the Kindle Fire. Finally, the Kindle Fire’s new Silk browser leverages Amazon’s massive cloud infrastructure for storage and processing optimization; there’s nothing like this anywhere else in the tablet world currently, and it’ll be hard to imitate by competitors.
Kellar Jane December 31, 2012
It is more a tablet than anything else. I would recommend you check out a few views on the internet to make a good buying decision. The Kindle Fire has a really great price for pre-order. Amazon is a really great company as well so just check out a few reviews on the internet. Here is a great one I found helpfull: http://reviewsforconsumers.info/kindle-fire-review.html
Coolio December 31, 2012
Hi, VegasKid, Kindle Fire is as far from iPad as Earth is from Moon besides being late to the game a year after Nook Color from Barnes & Noble. Limitation of Kindle Fire are so numerous that it might take a couple of pages to list, I’ll try a few:
1. Kindle Fire doesn’t have microSD slot that, for example, Nook Color has thus it is stuck with 6 GB usable internal storage unlike Nook Color that can get up to 32 GB card in. Kindles are made to be almost like a “dumb terminal” of the past to make sure you’re tied up to Amazon’s storage on the web (for which you need Wi-Fi connection to get to) and you can only store content you get from Amazon there, not other files. Quoting Amazon on Kindle Fire: “Free cloud storage for all Amazon content”. Get it, Amazon content?
2. The stats of how long the battery can last (Kindle Fire theory is 7.5 hours) are taken with Wi-Fi off. It will last only about 3 hours if you use it to access content from their Cloud storage over Wi-Fi.
3. Amazon can spy on your web activity through their new cloud-integrated web browser of Kindle Fire.
4. VERY IMPORTANT – lack of microSD slot means that if you decide to root your Kindle Fire, you’ll have to root the actual device thus there will be no coming back. On Nook Color, you can make it boot from a “rooted” microSD card and if you want to get back to the original Nook you can just take out the card and reboot.
5. Kindle Fire doesn’t have a camera.
6. Kindle Fire has about 70% less usable screen area than iPad 2.
7. Kindle doesn’t support eBooks in ePub format that is the most used format in the world.
8. Kindle app store contains only Amazon approved apps and it does not include (and will not include) Netflix app that iPad has and Nook Color is getting thus again you’re stuck with Amazon content only.
9. Amazon confirmed that you cannot download anything to Kindle Fire when traveling abroad.
10. Amazon says it will review every app in its Appstore for Fire compatibility, as part of an automated process. Rejected apps will include those that rely on a gyroscope, camera, WAN module, Bluetooth, microphone, GPS, or micro SD. Apps are also forbidden from using Google’s Mobile Services (and in-app billing), which, if included, will have to be “gracefully” removed. In terms of actual content, Amazon has outlawed all apps that change the tablet’s UI in any way (including theme- or wallpaper-based tools), as well as any that demand root access (it remains to be seen how the company will treat the root-dependent apps already in its store).
11. I’d recommend waiting for Nook Color 2 that is rumored to be released by Barnes & Noble shortly.
Moon January 1, 2013
kindle fire is a full functions tablet as other android tablet except without 3g,camera
carlo juancho January 1, 2013
It is both
you can:
read books
listen to music
play games
watch movies
use android apps
youtube
email
browse the web
It is being sold as a loss to Amazon they will only profit from the sales of books movies music subscriptions etc
However the other thing it doesn’t have is a gyroscope (i.e. the thing that lets you turn it upside down and still read it the right way up etc) that is why driving games won’t work on it.
However, in some ways it’s better than a normal tablet as unlike the ipad it is flash compatible which means it’s better for surfing the web.
Kindle Fire can do everything you describe, it’s the first device in the Kindle series that does all that – the previous versions were just ebook readers. Kindle Fire is primarily a tablet, not a reader. http://www.squidoo.com/kindle-fire-or-ipad
Happy January 1, 2013
The Good: Apple’s iPad 2 is dramatically thinner and boasts front and rear cameras, FaceTime video chat, a faster processor, and 3G options for both AT&T and Verizon.
The Bad: The iPad’s screen resolution hasn’t budged, photo quality is mediocre, there’s still no Adobe Flash support, and ports for HDMI, USB, and SD all require adapters.
The Bottom Line: The iPad 2 refines an already excellent product. Its easy-to-use interface, vast app catalog, and marathon battery life bolster Apple’s claim to being the king of tablets.
The good: Apple’s iPad 2 is dramatically thinner and boasts front and rear cameras, FaceTime video chat, a faster processor, and 3G options for both AT&T and Verizon.
The bad: The iPad’s screen resolution hasn’t budged, photo quality is mediocre, there’s still no Adobe Flash support, and ports for HDMI, USB, and SD all require adapters.
The bottom line: The iPad 2 refines an already excellent product. Its easy-to-use interface, vast app catalog, and marathon battery life bolster Apple’s claim to being the king of tablets.
Review:
The competition must really hate Apple. The Apple iPad wasn’t just a successful tablet computer in 2010–it was the tablet computer. In one fell swoop, Apple created the new tablet market and sold tens of millions of iPads in spite of a global economic downturn and considerable skepticism.
The same, only better
With the iPad’s second go-around, Apple sticks to its successful formula. The iPad 2 is thinner, faster, and includes two cameras, but otherwise, the iPad stays the same: size, price, capacity, and features all carry over.
The kindle fire is defiantly more a tablet then an ereader. Frankly the silk browser is going to be way better than the ipad browser, considering it supports flash and youtube etc.
You can get a good deal on the kindle fire here:
http://www.shoppersource.net/goto/kindle_fire
I would totally go for the kindle fire over the alternatives, since not only is it the cheapest cost full featured tablet going, but it amazon is going to have the hugest media selection that is going to dwarf everyone else. They already own the publishing world, and now they are moving into movies etc, which you will have full access to on the fire.
So YES, it’s just like an ipad – it supports fast web browsing, youtube, runs google android apps, media player & color ereader- which considering the price it’s insane.
The Kindle Fire, like all LCD-based ereaders, is really a tablet. While it’ll be fully capable of being used to read ebooks, it’ll also perform great on those other non-reading applications that you seek. Be aware, however, that’s it will not be the best for long-run reading. The E Ink ereaders display ebooks via ambient light just like physical books and are excellent for long run reading but lousy for apps, games, web browsing, and videos.
Yes, the Kindle Fire will be competitive with the iPad. So many will be sold that developers will be drawn to the platform like they were to the iPad. There are already many apps available (but not yet nearly as many as iPad/iPhone/iPod). Amazon is keeping the cost of the Kindle Fire low in hopes to make more money selling apps and other media. With its previous Kindle success, and with its success as an online merchant in general, it’s well positioned succeed with the Kindle Fire. Finally, the Kindle Fire’s new Silk browser leverages Amazon’s massive cloud infrastructure for storage and processing optimization; there’s nothing like this anywhere else in the tablet world currently, and it’ll be hard to imitate by competitors.
It is more a tablet than anything else. I would recommend you check out a few views on the internet to make a good buying decision. The Kindle Fire has a really great price for pre-order. Amazon is a really great company as well so just check out a few reviews on the internet. Here is a great one I found helpfull: http://reviewsforconsumers.info/kindle-fire-review.html
Hi, VegasKid, Kindle Fire is as far from iPad as Earth is from Moon besides being late to the game a year after Nook Color from Barnes & Noble. Limitation of Kindle Fire are so numerous that it might take a couple of pages to list, I’ll try a few:
1. Kindle Fire doesn’t have microSD slot that, for example, Nook Color has thus it is stuck with 6 GB usable internal storage unlike Nook Color that can get up to 32 GB card in. Kindles are made to be almost like a “dumb terminal” of the past to make sure you’re tied up to Amazon’s storage on the web (for which you need Wi-Fi connection to get to) and you can only store content you get from Amazon there, not other files. Quoting Amazon on Kindle Fire: “Free cloud storage for all Amazon content”. Get it, Amazon content?
2. The stats of how long the battery can last (Kindle Fire theory is 7.5 hours) are taken with Wi-Fi off. It will last only about 3 hours if you use it to access content from their Cloud storage over Wi-Fi.
3. Amazon can spy on your web activity through their new cloud-integrated web browser of Kindle Fire.
4. VERY IMPORTANT – lack of microSD slot means that if you decide to root your Kindle Fire, you’ll have to root the actual device thus there will be no coming back. On Nook Color, you can make it boot from a “rooted” microSD card and if you want to get back to the original Nook you can just take out the card and reboot.
5. Kindle Fire doesn’t have a camera.
6. Kindle Fire has about 70% less usable screen area than iPad 2.
7. Kindle doesn’t support eBooks in ePub format that is the most used format in the world.
8. Kindle app store contains only Amazon approved apps and it does not include (and will not include) Netflix app that iPad has and Nook Color is getting thus again you’re stuck with Amazon content only.
9. Amazon confirmed that you cannot download anything to Kindle Fire when traveling abroad.
10. Amazon says it will review every app in its Appstore for Fire compatibility, as part of an automated process. Rejected apps will include those that rely on a gyroscope, camera, WAN module, Bluetooth, microphone, GPS, or micro SD. Apps are also forbidden from using Google’s Mobile Services (and in-app billing), which, if included, will have to be “gracefully” removed. In terms of actual content, Amazon has outlawed all apps that change the tablet’s UI in any way (including theme- or wallpaper-based tools), as well as any that demand root access (it remains to be seen how the company will treat the root-dependent apps already in its store).
11. I’d recommend waiting for Nook Color 2 that is rumored to be released by Barnes & Noble shortly.
kindle fire is a full functions tablet as other android tablet except without 3g,camera
It is both
you can:
read books
listen to music
play games
watch movies
use android apps
youtube
email
browse the web
It is being sold as a loss to Amazon they will only profit from the sales of books movies music subscriptions etc
I found a good review of Kindle Fire here
http://www.kindle.ofwtoday.com
I already ordered mine I am exited : )
Yes, it can.
However the other thing it doesn’t have is a gyroscope (i.e. the thing that lets you turn it upside down and still read it the right way up etc) that is why driving games won’t work on it.
However, in some ways it’s better than a normal tablet as unlike the ipad it is flash compatible which means it’s better for surfing the web.
http://www.squidoo.com/ipad-vs-kindle-fire-comparison
Kindle Fire can do everything you describe, it’s the first device in the Kindle series that does all that – the previous versions were just ebook readers. Kindle Fire is primarily a tablet, not a reader.
http://www.squidoo.com/kindle-fire-or-ipad
The Good: Apple’s iPad 2 is dramatically thinner and boasts front and rear cameras, FaceTime video chat, a faster processor, and 3G options for both AT&T and Verizon.
The Bad: The iPad’s screen resolution hasn’t budged, photo quality is mediocre, there’s still no Adobe Flash support, and ports for HDMI, USB, and SD all require adapters.
The Bottom Line: The iPad 2 refines an already excellent product. Its easy-to-use interface, vast app catalog, and marathon battery life bolster Apple’s claim to being the king of tablets.
The good: Apple’s iPad 2 is dramatically thinner and boasts front and rear cameras, FaceTime video chat, a faster processor, and 3G options for both AT&T and Verizon.
The bad: The iPad’s screen resolution hasn’t budged, photo quality is mediocre, there’s still no Adobe Flash support, and ports for HDMI, USB, and SD all require adapters.
The bottom line: The iPad 2 refines an already excellent product. Its easy-to-use interface, vast app catalog, and marathon battery life bolster Apple’s claim to being the king of tablets.
Review:
The competition must really hate Apple. The Apple iPad wasn’t just a successful tablet computer in 2010–it was the tablet computer. In one fell swoop, Apple created the new tablet market and sold tens of millions of iPads in spite of a global economic downturn and considerable skepticism.
The same, only better
With the iPad’s second go-around, Apple sticks to its successful formula. The iPad 2 is thinner, faster, and includes two cameras, but otherwise, the iPad stays the same: size, price, capacity, and features all carry over.